Cisco has sued Apple over use of iPhone Name
"We think Cisco's trademark suit is silly...We believe (their) trademark registration is tenuous at best," said Natalie Kerris, an Apple spokeswoman. "There are already several companies using the iPhone name for VoIP (voice over IP) products. We're the first company ever to use iPhone for a cell phone. If Cisco wants to challenge us on it, we're confident we'll prevail," Kerris said.
So it's a legal battle now. It will be interesting to see more details on how Cisco claims it is damaged by Apple's use of the name regardless of whether there is a trademark infringement or not. It seems to us, that Cisco will actually benefit from Apple using the iPhone name rather than the reverse. Since Apple's iPhone is not a real product yet, Apple always has the option of using another name. If it weren't used so ubiquitously without defense, Apple might have been able to claim that its trademark is the small "i" in from of a product's common description, first used for the iMac. [Bill Fox]
Saw something? Send a tip
The archive ran on reader tips. What did you see, where, and do you want the credit?