Hands-On Report--Mac OS X 10.5.3, How Fast Is It?
Apple released Mac OS X 10.5.3 on May 28 and I have been using it since, experiencing no problems. So, I ran my full set of speed tests on my dual quad-core 2.8GHz Mac Pro with 2GB of RAM running Mac OS X 10.5.3. As an aside, I have found that 2GB of RAM is plenty for what I do except when running Windows with Parallels Desktop for Mac so I have ordered a 4GB kit from my sponsor, Trans International. Here are the results:
| Test | Mac Pro | Mac Pro | MacBook Pro 2.4GHz C2D |
|---|---|---|---|
BENCHMARKS/Mac OS X Version |
10.5.3 |
10.5.2 |
10.5.2 |
Altivec Fractal 1.3 (GFLOPS) |
48.4 |
49.2 |
9.8 |
Cinebench R10 Rendering (8x) |
18964 |
18460 |
n/a |
-OpenGL Hardware Lighting |
5994 |
5919 |
n/a |
Let1kWindowsBloom 1.0+ |
8 |
8 |
11 |
Xbench 1.3 - CPU |
184 |
190 |
150 |
- Threading |
801 |
811 |
188 |
- Memory |
182 |
182 |
158 |
- Quartz Graphics |
227 |
228 |
192 |
- OpenGL Graphics |
176 |
191 |
161 |
-User Interface Graphics |
420 |
403 |
326 |
"REAL WORLD" TESTS |
|||
Startup (sec) |
28 |
25 |
52 |
Shutdown (sec) |
9 |
12 |
7 |
Dup. 500 MB Folder (sec) |
26 |
28 |
63 |
Quake III Arena (frames/sec) |
980 |
999 |
686 |
Halo 2.0.2 (frames/sec) |
99 |
98 |
115 |
The mixed results show that Mac OS X 10.5.3 is overall no faster nor no slower than 10.5.2. However, my generally vastly faster Mac Pro still runs Halo 2.0.2 (Intel version) some 14 percent slower than my former MacBook Pro.
Over the years, my experience has been that ATI's top graphics cards have out-performed Nvidia's on the Mac for 3D games with only an occasional exception. Hopefully, ATI will release a fast after-market graphics card for the latest Mac Pro. [Bill Fox]
Saw something? Send a tip
The archive ran on reader tips. What did you see, where, and do you want the credit?