Mac OS X 10.0.2--How Fast Is It?
| Application | X 10.0 | X 10.0.1 | X 10.0.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netscape 4.77 |
|
|
|
| Word 2001 |
|
|
|
| IE 5.1 |
|
|
|
| OmniWeb 4.0cf3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| System Preferences |
|
|
|
*Not comparable, OmniWeb 4.0rc1
The launch times (average of three launches) are significantly faster for the Classic and Carbon applications in 10.0.2. OmniWeb 4.0rc1 launches significantly faster than 4.0cf3. The launch times for the two Cocoa-native applications (Mail and System Preferences), already fast, are unchanged.
We previously (4/26) timed several web browser operations on our 400 MHz PowerBook 2000 for a number of web browsers using Mac OS X 10.0.2. Here are the results for several browsers using Mac OS X 10.0.2:
| Action | IE 5.0 | IE 5.1 | iCab 2.5 | OmniWeb* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launch/Load Macs Only! |
|
|
|
|
| Scroll Macs Only! |
|
|
|
|
| Load SiteLink.net |
|
|
|
|
| Back to Macs Only! |
|
|
|
|
*Not comparable, OmniWeb 4.0cf3 vs 4.0rc1
The Classic mode Internet Explorer was slightly faster with Mac OS X 10.0.2 but the two Carbonized browsers, IE 5.1 and iCab 2.5, are significantly faster. OmniWeb 4.0rc1, a Cocoa-native browser which was released today, is now as fast as any of the Carbonized web browsers.
While we didn't time it before, Adobe GoLive 4.0.1 operating in Classic mode launches and parses the Macs Only! HTML code much faster than with v10.0.1. Overall, the performance of Mac OS X on our 400 MHz PowerBook 2000, which we consider to be on the margin of acceptable performance with Mac OS X, is perceptibly improved.
Saw something? Send a tip
The archive ran on reader tips. What did you see, where, and do you want the credit?