From the Dark Side--M$ Antitrust Settlement Tunney Act Hearing Yesterday

is covered by this CNet article. The opponents argued principally that the settlement is inadequate because it does not deal with code comingling that M$ was found guilty of and upheld by the Appeals Court, i.e. the comingling of Internet Explorer and Windows code was an anticompetitive violation. This was the heart of the Justice Department's original case but is ignored in the proposed settlement according to the opponents. [Dana Baggett]

Saw something? Send a tip or a correction

The archive ran on reader tips. What did you see, where, and do you want the credit? Something wrong on this page? Say so and it gets fixed.

Read by the editor. You get a copy by email. Never published without your say.

More in Dark Side · This month in the archive