PC Magazine "Fibbed" in Article on G5/Dell Comparo?

Apple can not shake myths because even respected publications too often repeat them. Take, for example, the PC Mag article that favorably compared the new Dual 2-GHz Power Mac G5 with a Dell Precision 650 Workstation (dual 3.06 GHz Xeon CPUs). The article used a BTO-configured G5 costing $4349 (an ATI 9800 Pro graphics card and an additional 1.5 GB PC3200 RAM were added) and states in part "... comparing the results with a similarly configured (and priced) Dell Precision 650 Workstation...."

Similarly priced? Give us a break! According to our visit to the Dell web site, the similarly configured Dell 650 (dual 3.06 GHz 1 MB L3 cache processors, 2 GB PC2100 memory, a 120 GB HD and an equivalent DVD-RW drive) costs $5,884 and even then it only includes slower PC2100 RAM and a smaller 120 GB hard drive. The "similar" Dell is over $1500 more expensive! An accurate statement by the PC Mag article would have been "... comparing the results with a similarly configured (but much more expensive) Dell Precision 650 Workstation...." Come on PC Mag--tell the truth!!! [Dana Baggett]

Saw something? Send a tip

The archive ran on reader tips. What did you see, where, and do you want the credit?

Read by the editor. Never published without your say.

More in Apple hardware · This month in the archive